Well, I’ve been following the murder trial lately and just wanted to have my comment heard…

As before (my initial post about Canny Ong started here: Murder of Canny Ong…), I’m still deeply intrigued by the response of the 2 plainclothes policemen who questioned the accused murder suspect, Ahmad Najib Aris and Canny Ong in Kelana Jaya - long before the murder and rape took place.

Read the news yesterday about the policemen’s testimony to court for the murder trial - can see here at Bernama

Still can’t understand… why ON EARTH they didn’t pursue further or report the incident to the police station/command centre when:
- the policemen took both Ahmad Najib and Canny’s IC for verification
- they noticed Canny was giving hand signal of some sorts
- Ahmad Najib refused to get out of the car when instructed by the policemen
- A sudden change of reaction by Ahmad, where he wound up the window, locked the door, started the engine and sped off
- Leaving the scene without first taking back the ICs from the policemen
- Policemen fired 2 shots at the fleeing car (in which a tyre got punctured)
- Policemen gave chase to the fleeing car

Tell me, HOW COME IT DIDN’T WARRANT REPORTING THE INCIDENT BACK TO STATION/COMMAND CENTRE RIGHT AWAY WHEN 2 SHOTS WERE FIRED? HAVE THEY NO NEED TO REPORT THE USE OF FIREARMS DURING PATROL?

How can the policemen not take down the car number details during their patrol - since they were investigating the presence of the car in the first place! How come there’s no swift action to help the girl?

Still irks me plenty to know that the rape and murder of Canny Ong could’ve been prevented! smiley

So what if our police force is one of the best in solving crimes when they did little to PREVENT CRIMES in the FIRST PLACE? :confused:

What do you think of this? Would like to hear your opinion… pen them in the comment section below…